If a person desires a radically different way of living than the banal acceptance of the status quo there will automatically be contradictions and tension inhabiting the gap between the way things are and the way you want things to be. Calling yourself (or others) a hypocrite for noticing those tensions does nothing to lessen the contradictions or give you a way to navigate between or around them. I see no purpose in invoking such a term unless you are only interested in moral objections to the status quo, and there are plenty of other ways to object to it.
As long as capitalism remains the dominant socio-economic system, and as long as people continue to inhabit urban spaces, we are all pretty much forced to have jobs to pay for food and shelter. If I want to live in a world where there are no jobs and no money, does that make me a hypocrite for having a job and using money? Do you see where I'm going with this?
When/if the tensions and contradictions become unbearable you will either change your vision(s) and desire(s) or you'll change your job/lifestyle. One of the more interesting things about an anarchist perspective versus an authoritarian one is that anarchists recognize that the choice is yours.
In terms of increasing your knowledge of anarchy, this site is a good place. The Anarchist Library is an indispensable resource for texts. There may even be an infoshop or other anarchist project near you.
If you let people here know where your interests lie, we will overflow with recommendations for reading material.