Login
Register
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Users
Ask a Question
About Us
Welcome to Anarchy101 Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers about
anarchism
from other members of the community.
Is there an anarchist refutation of The German Ideology?
+1
vote
And if not, would you consider writing one?
asked
1 year
ago
by
enkidu
(
5,680
points)
–
edited
1 year
ago
by
enkidu
stirner
proudhon
marx
theory
communism
Do you mean the entire screed or just the part about Saint Max?
—
1 year
ago
by
lawrence
(
6,710
points)
–
edited
6 months
ago
by
dot
More the parts having to do with Stirner & Proudhon
—
1 year
ago
by
enkidu
(
5,680
points)
–
edited
6 months
ago
by
anonymous
That'd be a pretty tall order. Since I'm off work for a while, I'll try to see if I can wade into the scurrilous bad faith attacks to see if any of it is even worthy of a serious response.
—
1 year
ago
by
lawrence
(
6,710
points)
–
edited
6 months
ago
by
anonymous
1 Answer
+2
votes
No, there is no anarchist refutation of Marx's The German Ideology, at least from a Stirnerite position. And no, I would not consider writing one, because I believe that, despite his many petty misunderstandings and ad hominems, Marx's critique of Stirner is basically sound.
If you're desperate you can try Saul Newman, an academic who has written on Stirner from a post-structrualist anarchist perspective, including an attack on Marx (that is, a shallow and reductive interpretation of Marx). Newman says, for instance, in From Bakunin to Lacan: "For Stirner—and this is the crux of his critique of the humanist Marx—man creates himself". Newman basically reiterates Stirner by arguing, for instance, that Marx posits a normative "human essence" that denies difference, that Marx subordinates the concrete individual to an abstract and imaginary "Society", etc.
answered
1 year
ago
by
pauley
(
280
points)
–
edited
1 year
ago
by
pauley
Also, any serious Stirnerite or anarchist refutation of G.I. would need to consider an important and overlooked point: Marx's critique of Stirner in G.I. cannot be isolated within the section entitled "Saint Max". The first and justly famous part of G.I. (misleadingly) entitled "Feuerbach", and the later part dealing with utopian or "True Socialism", were in fact culled from Marx's original response to Stirner. Marx with Engels re-arranged and edited the book in order to make their break with Feuerbach and "old" socialism appear independent and original, when in fact Stirner had beat them to the punch in The Ego and Its Own!
—
1 year
ago
by
pauley
(
280
points)
Related questions
+2
votes
1
answer
Is there an anarchist definition of class?
asked
5 months
ago
by
analfisting
(
270
points)
theory
marx
class
anarchism
+1
vote
3
answers
Left Communism & Classical Anarchist Positions?
asked
1 month
ago
by
anonymous
anarchism
practice
theory
left
communism
–1
vote
3
answers
What are the differences between Anti-State communism and Insurrectionary Anarchism?
asked
1 year
ago
by
SophiaYN
(
460
points)
anarchism
communism
debate
theory
difference
0
votes
3
answers
Why is the primary framework of anarchist activity and theoretical production described as "The Movement"?
asked
1 year
ago
by
madlib
(
3,140
points)
practice
anarchy
paradigm
theory
0
votes
4
answers
Is the family structure compatable with an egalitarian society?
asked
1 year
ago
by
john apolo
(
470
points)
gender
family
society
communism